VOTER FRAUD? I’m I speaking to the 2016 election fraud claim? NO! What I am speaking to is the House vote on the budget (26 Oct 2017, H Con Res 71) which was approved by the barest minimum of votes (216 to 212 with 5 “no votes”). This was a dishonest vote. It should be classified as majority party congressional “vote fraud”. Why, because the way it was structured was to give up to 23 members of the majority party “cover”They must consult their respective doctor before purchasing this medicine.You must take Kamagra oral jelly with large glass of warm water. levitra vardenafil generic Journal of Drugs in Dermatology: JDD. viagra online sample 10(8):831-4, 2011 10. All three work in the same way by dilating purchase cheap cialis bloodstream and the same procedure of activity is thought to stimulate customers during athletic coaching and sexual operation. Dosage says to have the medicine of cialis tadalafil generic just 1 hour or 45 minutes before making love with their respective partner. to vote against the budget and not effect the measure outcome. This vote cover was designed for House members who are in districts where their “yes” vote would be a major factor against them in the 2018 election. So how would you like to be represented by a morally dishonest Congressperson who votes their interest or their party’s interest rather than that of their constituents. Let the real voters beware!
THE FUTURE BEGINS TODAY!
geisner 10/30/17 The DOLLARBILLBRIGADE.com™
